TWIN PINES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

232

42%

LEVEL 2

212

38%

LEVEL 3

90

16%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

137

37%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

114

41%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

118

43%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

76

39%

LEVEL 2

74

38%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

19

41%

LEVEL 2

24

52%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

16

43%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

101
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

204

43%

LEVEL 2

173

36%

LEVEL 3

80

17%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

118

37%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

205

39%

LEVEL 2

207

40%

LEVEL 3

90

17%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

112

34%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

27

82%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

25

76%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

99
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

150

41%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

84
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

101

45%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

118

61%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

96

69%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

217

43%

LEVEL 2

198

39%

LEVEL 3

76

15%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

131

39%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.