Skip to Content
Main content

EAST MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 943

LEVEL 1

491

52%

LEVEL 2

356

38%

LEVEL 3

80

8%

LEVEL 4

16

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

128

47%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

249

52%

LEVEL 2

185

39%

LEVEL 3

39

8%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

45

37%

LEVEL 2

51

42%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

242

52%

LEVEL 2

171

37%

LEVEL 3

41

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

83

55%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

68

54%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

16

44%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

404

53%

LEVEL 2

282

37%

LEVEL 3

60

8%

LEVEL 4

13

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

110

48%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 791

LEVEL 1

363

46%

LEVEL 2

333

42%

LEVEL 3

79

10%

LEVEL 4

16

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

94

40%

LEVEL 2

97

41%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

128

84%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

34

87%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

333

45%

LEVEL 2

314

42%

LEVEL 3

77

10%

LEVEL 4

15

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

93

43%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

158

77%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

3

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

46

84%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

40

39%

LEVEL 2

42

41%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

19

51%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 840

LEVEL 1

451

54%

LEVEL 2

314

37%

LEVEL 3

64

8%

LEVEL 4

11

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

118

50%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.