Skip to Content
Main content

HAUPPAUGE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

90

17%

LEVEL 2

228

44%

LEVEL 3

133

26%

LEVEL 4

67

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

116

49%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

15

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

23

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

16

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

191

44%

LEVEL 3

115

27%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

55

41%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

216

47%

LEVEL 3

127

27%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

38

68%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

200
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

86

17%

LEVEL 2

223

44%

LEVEL 3

133

26%

LEVEL 4

67

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

75

16%

LEVEL 2

212

44%

LEVEL 3

124

26%

LEVEL 4

67

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.