Skip to Content
Main content

RUTH C KINNEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

61

33%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

30

34%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

29

37%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

19

20%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

21

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

40

34%

LEVEL 4

29

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

60

36%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

56

36%

LEVEL 4

35

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

56

37%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

47

38%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

25

50%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.