THOMAS J LAHEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

471
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

66

9%

LEVEL 2

199

27%

LEVEL 3

270

37%

LEVEL 4

201

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

132

28%

LEVEL 3

190

40%

LEVEL 4

111

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

220
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

138

38%

LEVEL 4

82

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

98

43%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

251
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

119

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

156
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

64

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

19

58%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

390
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

45

8%

LEVEL 2

154

26%

LEVEL 3

220

37%

LEVEL 4

170

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

147

43%

LEVEL 4

94

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

28

48%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

445
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

26

4%

LEVEL 2

160

25%

LEVEL 3

252

40%

LEVEL 4

193

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

181

42%

LEVEL 4

109

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

40

38%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

301
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

190

41%

LEVEL 4

111

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

449
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

175

26%

LEVEL 3

252

38%

LEVEL 4

197

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

108

27%

LEVEL 3

173

43%

LEVEL 4

104

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

27

37%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.