Skip to Content
Main content

COLD SPRING HARBOR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

502
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 793

LEVEL 1

75

9%

LEVEL 2

216

27%

LEVEL 3

298

38%

LEVEL 4

204

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

405
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

65

11%

LEVEL 2

135

22%

LEVEL 3

207

34%

LEVEL 4

198

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

115

30%

LEVEL 3

151

40%

LEVEL 4

80

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

179
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

65

24%

LEVEL 3

96

35%

LEVEL 4

83

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

271
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

101

24%

LEVEL 3

147

36%

LEVEL 4

124

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

226
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

70

21%

LEVEL 3

111

33%

LEVEL 4

115

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

13

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

460
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 730

LEVEL 1

68

9%

LEVEL 2

202

28%

LEVEL 3

272

37%

LEVEL 4

188

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

365
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

60

11%

LEVEL 2

123

22%

LEVEL 3

189

34%

LEVEL 4

176

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

13

50%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

492
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

23

3%

LEVEL 2

189

27%

LEVEL 3

291

41%

LEVEL 4

201

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

29

5%

LEVEL 2

125

23%

LEVEL 3

199

36%

LEVEL 4

195

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

52

58%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

36

63%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

402
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

133

22%

LEVEL 3

206

34%

LEVEL 4

196

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

500
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 788

LEVEL 1

74

9%

LEVEL 2

214

27%

LEVEL 3

298

38%

LEVEL 4

202

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

403
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

61

10%

LEVEL 2

135

23%

LEVEL 3

207

35%

LEVEL 4

196

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.