Skip to Content
Main content

DAWNWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

127

27%

LEVEL 2

157

34%

LEVEL 3

123

26%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

37

35%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

16

41%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

23

55%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

57

43%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

34

46%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

38

60%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

141

37%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

69

79%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

30

68%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

180
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

99

23%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

28

85%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

27

77%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

45

37%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

44

43%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.