Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT CUSHMAN MURPHY JR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

142

38%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

22

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

16

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

15

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

12

17%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

131

41%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

27

33%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

32

67%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

131

38%

LEVEL 3

107

31%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

20

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.