HORNELL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 750

LEVEL 1

339

45%

LEVEL 2

275

37%

LEVEL 3

101

13%

LEVEL 4

35

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

179

42%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

79

18%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

155

43%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

80

41%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

184

47%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

296

44%

LEVEL 2

254

38%

LEVEL 3

92

14%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

155

40%

LEVEL 2

135

35%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

21

62%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

242

39%

LEVEL 2

248

40%

LEVEL 3

97

16%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

127

35%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

97

76%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

52

80%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

120

47%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

275

56%

LEVEL 2

155

32%

LEVEL 3

48

10%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

139

50%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.