Skip to Content
Main content

CAMPBELL-SAVONA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

131

37%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

97

29%

LEVEL 2

143

43%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

70

37%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

74

44%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

61

37%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

52

32%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

127

37%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

140

43%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

86

29%

LEVEL 2

125

42%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

125

46%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

45

78%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

38

62%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

90

43%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

86

47%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.