Skip to Content
Main content

CAMPBELL-SAVONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

92

38%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

95

42%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

49

39%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

46

42%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

43

37%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

90

38%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

94

43%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

83

43%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

21

84%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

43

42%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

60

44%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

40

32%

LEVEL 2

52

42%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.