Skip to Content
Main content

BATH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

162

27%

LEVEL 2

241

40%

LEVEL 3

153

26%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

89

29%

LEVEL 2

125

41%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

79

27%

LEVEL 2

115

40%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

43

26%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

126

41%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

46

33%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

155

27%

LEVEL 2

233

40%

LEVEL 3

149

26%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

214

43%

LEVEL 3

147

30%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

52

21%

LEVEL 2

117

47%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

69

67%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

37

73%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

107

43%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

18

17%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

124

36%

LEVEL 2

134

39%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

71

37%

LEVEL 2

82

42%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.