WATERLOO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

246

36%

LEVEL 2

264

39%

LEVEL 3

124

18%

LEVEL 4

44

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

114

34%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

132

38%

LEVEL 2

129

38%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

56

32%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

217

36%

LEVEL 2

240

39%

LEVEL 3

114

19%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

80

28%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

153

27%

LEVEL 2

242

43%

LEVEL 3

122

22%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

111

44%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

93

79%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

54

86%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

96

30%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

150

42%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.