WATKINS GLEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

156

33%

LEVEL 2

201

43%

LEVEL 3

81

17%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

117

30%

LEVEL 2

153

40%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

80

36%

LEVEL 2

90

40%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

76

44%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

111

45%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

145

33%

LEVEL 2

186

43%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

108

31%

LEVEL 2

140

40%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

107

27%

LEVEL 2

183

46%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

74

23%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

49

70%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

43

70%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

113
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

115

30%

LEVEL 2

153

40%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

97

41%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

79

41%

LEVEL 2

74

38%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.