Skip to Content
Main content

ODESSA-MONTOUR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

116

36%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

98

37%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

54

32%

LEVEL 2

74

44%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

44

32%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

62

41%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

54

43%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

111

36%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

89

36%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

119

46%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

51

88%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

36

92%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

39

26%

LEVEL 2

66

44%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

77

46%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

69

51%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.