Skip to Content
Main content

JOSEPH B RADEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

92

24%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

71

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

42

23%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

18

69%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

15

68%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

70

37%

LEVEL 4

46

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

71

36%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.