Skip to Content
Main content

SCOTIA-GLENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,067

LEVEL 1

329

31%

LEVEL 2

403

38%

LEVEL 3

243

23%

LEVEL 4

92

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

179

25%

LEVEL 2

244

34%

LEVEL 3

190

27%

LEVEL 4

95

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

153

31%

LEVEL 2

190

38%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

178
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

176

31%

LEVEL 2

213

38%

LEVEL 3

130

23%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

106

27%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

318
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 986

LEVEL 1

297

30%

LEVEL 2

371

38%

LEVEL 3

229

23%

LEVEL 4

89

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

270
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 650

LEVEL 1

157

24%

LEVEL 2

223

34%

LEVEL 3

176

27%

LEVEL 4

94

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 851

LEVEL 1

169

20%

LEVEL 2

359

42%

LEVEL 3

233

27%

LEVEL 4

90

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

105

17%

LEVEL 2

224

37%

LEVEL 3

181

30%

LEVEL 4

94

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

160

74%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

74

71%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

284
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 792

LEVEL 1

203

26%

LEVEL 2

305

39%

LEVEL 3

203

26%

LEVEL 4

81

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

175

35%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

84

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

126

46%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.