Skip to Content
Main content

GALWAY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

148

40%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

86

24%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

141

45%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

46

81%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

24

67%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

105

40%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

39

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

36

34%

LEVEL 2

43

41%

LEVEL 3

23

22%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

27

43%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.