Skip to Content
Main content

GOWANA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 732

LEVEL 1

103

14%

LEVEL 2

299

41%

LEVEL 3

228

31%

LEVEL 4

102

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

56

11%

LEVEL 2

153

31%

LEVEL 3

168

34%

LEVEL 4

121

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

114

32%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

156

41%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

17

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

304
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

94

14%

LEVEL 2

272

41%

LEVEL 3

216

32%

LEVEL 4

88

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

244
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

149

35%

LEVEL 4

95

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

55

8%

LEVEL 2

276

42%

LEVEL 3

223

34%

LEVEL 4

101

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

163

37%

LEVEL 4

119

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

48

62%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

27

51%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

315
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

77

12%

LEVEL 2

263

40%

LEVEL 3

218

33%

LEVEL 4

97

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

275
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

135

30%

LEVEL 3

155

35%

LEVEL 4

120

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

26

34%

LEVEL 2

36

47%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.