TESAGO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

67

22%

LEVEL 3

104

35%

LEVEL 4

98

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

38

17%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

106

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

45

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

33

29%

LEVEL 4

54

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

53

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

35

32%

LEVEL 4

52

47%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

36

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

39

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

86

39%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

59

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

97

36%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

106

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

198
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

96

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

169
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

102

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

97

35%

LEVEL 4

98

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

104

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.