Skip to Content
Main content

NORWOOD-NORFOLK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

186

41%

LEVEL 2

186

41%

LEVEL 3

65

14%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

93

32%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

92

43%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

39

29%

LEVEL 2

58

43%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

104

45%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

54

35%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

169

41%

LEVEL 2

171

41%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

136

36%

LEVEL 2

172

45%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

108

43%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

50

75%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

27

66%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

96

52%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

143

54%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

70

42%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.