Skip to Content
Main content

GOUVERNEUR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

123

37%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

81

43%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

28

35%

LEVEL 2

37

46%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

65

38%

LEVEL 2

66

39%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

53

49%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

120

38%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

77

43%

LEVEL 2

66

37%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

78

29%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

55

37%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

45

74%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

26

68%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

58

35%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

23

33%

LEVEL 2

31

44%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

65

39%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

58

49%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

79
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

121

37%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

79

43%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.