Skip to Content
Main content

GOUVERNEUR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 657

LEVEL 1

265

40%

LEVEL 2

226

34%

LEVEL 3

129

20%

LEVEL 4

37

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

191

43%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

121

38%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

80

40%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

144

42%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

111

46%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

259

41%

LEVEL 2

215

34%

LEVEL 3

125

20%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

186

43%

LEVEL 2

140

33%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

161

31%

LEVEL 2

201

38%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

120

34%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

104

78%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

71

78%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

107

33%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

158

47%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

142

51%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

165
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

256

40%

LEVEL 2

221

34%

LEVEL 3

128

20%

LEVEL 4

37

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

104
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

187

43%

LEVEL 2

140

32%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.