Skip to Content
Main content

CANTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

129

24%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

153

28%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

78

19%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

238
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

124

24%

LEVEL 2

162

31%

LEVEL 3

153

29%

LEVEL 4

85

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

128

33%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

151

34%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

87

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

65

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

65

68%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

42

62%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

77

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

78

39%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.