Skip to Content
Main content

HEMPSTEAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

148

49%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

126

46%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

56

44%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

61

49%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

92

52%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

65

44%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

9

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

9

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

75

52%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

48

44%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

60

51%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

70

55%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

70

35%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

81

88%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

56

79%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

125

46%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

87

40%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

23

68%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

39

72%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

29

41%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

11

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

119

51%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

116

51%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.