Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSICK FALLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

141

42%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

97

37%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

79

44%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

54

38%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

30

25%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

74

24%

LEVEL 2

135

43%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

51

21%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

127

45%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

31

60%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

21

64%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

50

32%

LEVEL 2

73

47%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.