ONEONTA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

163

33%

LEVEL 2

171

34%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

54

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

50

42%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

92

38%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

40

29%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

126

31%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

89

22%

LEVEL 2

155

38%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

74

80%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

23

68%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

101

50%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

43

44%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.