Skip to Content
Main content

PHOENIX CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 751

LEVEL 1

232

31%

LEVEL 2

273

36%

LEVEL 3

167

22%

LEVEL 4

79

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

172

27%

LEVEL 2

232

36%

LEVEL 3

177

27%

LEVEL 4

63

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

79

25%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

234
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 710

LEVEL 1

217

31%

LEVEL 2

259

36%

LEVEL 3

159

22%

LEVEL 4

75

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

157

26%

LEVEL 2

220

36%

LEVEL 3

170

28%

LEVEL 4

61

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

166

25%

LEVEL 2

261

39%

LEVEL 3

165

25%

LEVEL 4

78

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

117

20%

LEVEL 2

221

39%

LEVEL 3

174

30%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

66

81%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

55

77%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

169

41%

LEVEL 2

149

36%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

133

37%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.