Skip to Content
Main content

MEXICO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

241

32%

LEVEL 2

298

40%

LEVEL 3

155

21%

LEVEL 4

55

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

158

29%

LEVEL 2

228

42%

LEVEL 3

121

22%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

124

33%

LEVEL 2

158

42%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

75

28%

LEVEL 2

122

46%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

117

32%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

230

32%

LEVEL 2

286

40%

LEVEL 3

152

21%

LEVEL 4

54

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

151

29%

LEVEL 2

216

41%

LEVEL 3

114

22%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

142

24%

LEVEL 2

258

43%

LEVEL 3

151

25%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

202

46%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

99

68%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

72

68%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

93

41%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

165

40%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.