Skip to Content
Main content

CENTRAL SQUARE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

533
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,519

LEVEL 1

392

26%

LEVEL 2

594

39%

LEVEL 3

374

25%

LEVEL 4

159

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

458
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,167

LEVEL 1

287

25%

LEVEL 2

422

36%

LEVEL 3

294

25%

LEVEL 4

164

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

273
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

178

24%

LEVEL 2

291

39%

LEVEL 3

191

26%

LEVEL 4

82

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

114

21%

LEVEL 2

208

39%

LEVEL 3

140

26%

LEVEL 4

75

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

260
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

214

28%

LEVEL 2

303

39%

LEVEL 3

183

24%

LEVEL 4

77

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

243
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

173

27%

LEVEL 2

214

34%

LEVEL 3

154

24%

LEVEL 4

89

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

509
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,448

LEVEL 1

370

26%

LEVEL 2

569

39%

LEVEL 3

352

24%

LEVEL 4

157

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

434
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,099

LEVEL 1

262

24%

LEVEL 2

403

37%

LEVEL 3

283

26%

LEVEL 4

151

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

518
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,295

LEVEL 1

230

18%

LEVEL 2

547

42%

LEVEL 3

362

28%

LEVEL 4

156

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

450
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 993

LEVEL 1

162

16%

LEVEL 2

381

38%

LEVEL 3

288

29%

LEVEL 4

162

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

162

72%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

125

72%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

384
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 887

LEVEL 1

145

16%

LEVEL 2

358

40%

LEVEL 3

264

30%

LEVEL 4

120

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

328
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 681

LEVEL 1

102

15%

LEVEL 2

251

37%

LEVEL 3

205

30%

LEVEL 4

123

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

247

39%

LEVEL 2

236

37%

LEVEL 3

110

17%

LEVEL 4

39

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

185

38%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

89

18%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.