NORTHSIDE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

370
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

82

13%

LEVEL 2

189

29%

LEVEL 3

228

36%

LEVEL 4

142

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

59

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

179
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

121

40%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

35

40%

LEVEL 4

20

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

191
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

39

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

345
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

55

10%

LEVEL 2

157

28%

LEVEL 3

212

38%

LEVEL 4

133

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

52

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

17

53%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

172

30%

LEVEL 3

217

38%

LEVEL 4

138

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

63

35%

LEVEL 4

58

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

44

58%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

334
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

125

25%

LEVEL 3

196

39%

LEVEL 4

138

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

53

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

64

46%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

15

32%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.