Skip to Content
Main content

GARDNERTOWN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

125

46%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

97

40%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

45

37%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

41

37%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

26

23%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

80

53%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

56

42%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

17

21%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

13

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

23

37%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

29

59%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

18

47%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

77

56%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

68

52%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

54

89%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

45

94%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

85

38%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

40

80%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

47

87%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

29

41%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

109

60%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

88

51%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.