OTISVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

86

26%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

51

29%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

31

28%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

23

40%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

19

46%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

35

85%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

35

90%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

93
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

51

20%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

35

43%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

31

48%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.