Skip to Content
Main content

C S DRIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

80

13%

LEVEL 2

188

31%

LEVEL 3

211

35%

LEVEL 4

132

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

93

18%

LEVEL 2

141

27%

LEVEL 3

185

36%

LEVEL 4

101

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

105

37%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

88

38%

LEVEL 4

52

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

93

28%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

73

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

97

34%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

75%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

332
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

187

31%

LEVEL 3

203

34%

LEVEL 4

129

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

277
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

90

18%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

179

36%

LEVEL 4

98

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

168

31%

LEVEL 3

205

38%

LEVEL 4

130

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

128

28%

LEVEL 3

181

39%

LEVEL 4

98

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

37

57%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

36

64%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

306
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

51

10%

LEVEL 2

164

31%

LEVEL 3

180

35%

LEVEL 4

126

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

263
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

117

26%

LEVEL 3

166

38%

LEVEL 4

97

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

29

32%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

31

40%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.