Skip to Content
Main content

DONALD S RAY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 817

LEVEL 1

148

18%

LEVEL 2

275

34%

LEVEL 3

242

30%

LEVEL 4

152

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

115

20%

LEVEL 2

181

32%

LEVEL 3

178

31%

LEVEL 4

100

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

207
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

125

31%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

187
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

83

20%

LEVEL 2

150

36%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

12

55%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

371
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 746

LEVEL 1

135

18%

LEVEL 2

240

32%

LEVEL 3

229

31%

LEVEL 4

142

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

101

20%

LEVEL 2

158

31%

LEVEL 3

164

32%

LEVEL 4

93

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

13

57%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

78

11%

LEVEL 2

250

35%

LEVEL 3

236

33%

LEVEL 4

149

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

68

13%

LEVEL 2

171

34%

LEVEL 3

169

33%

LEVEL 4

97

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

70

67%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

47

68%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

343
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

83

13%

LEVEL 2

201

32%

LEVEL 3

204

33%

LEVEL 4

139

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

144

31%

LEVEL 3

155

33%

LEVEL 4

93

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

65

34%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

42

39%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.