ONONDAGA HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

88

18%

LEVEL 2

224

46%

LEVEL 3

122

25%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

116

50%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

200

46%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

88

36%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

14

56%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

210

50%

LEVEL 3

119

28%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

43

70%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

33

73%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

134
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

95

34%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

199

47%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

88

38%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

25

42%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

26

46%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.