Skip to Content
Main content

WESTMORELAND CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

102

23%

LEVEL 2

168

39%

LEVEL 3

115

26%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

97

23%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

110

26%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

155

41%

LEVEL 3

113

30%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

88

36%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

42

74%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

66

38%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

54

34%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

44

45%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.