Skip to Content
Main content

LYNDON H STROUGH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

227

40%

LEVEL 2

259

46%

LEVEL 3

69

12%

LEVEL 4

8

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

101

44%

LEVEL 2

97

42%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

111

41%

LEVEL 2

129

47%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

50

44%

LEVEL 2

45

40%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

116

40%

LEVEL 2

130

45%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

51

43%

LEVEL 2

52

44%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

184

40%

LEVEL 2

211

46%

LEVEL 3

57

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

78

41%

LEVEL 2

80

42%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

25

48%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

18

49%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

155

33%

LEVEL 2

234

50%

LEVEL 3

69

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

89

49%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

72

74%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

40

82%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

221

40%

LEVEL 2

253

46%

LEVEL 3

69

13%

LEVEL 4

8

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

109

50%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

26

31%

LEVEL 2

37

44%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

159

46%

LEVEL 2

150

44%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

75

51%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.