Skip to Content
Main content

CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

101

19%

LEVEL 2

203

39%

LEVEL 3

136

26%

LEVEL 4

85

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

82

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

53

20%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

70

37%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

95

19%

LEVEL 2

192

39%

LEVEL 3

125

26%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

73

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

188

39%

LEVEL 3

133

28%

LEVEL 4

85

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

123

37%

LEVEL 4

80

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

29

62%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

219
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

100

19%

LEVEL 2

200

39%

LEVEL 3

135

26%

LEVEL 4

84

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

205
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

81

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

178

38%

LEVEL 3

128

27%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

80

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

25

49%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.