Skip to Content
Main content

ROYALTON-HARTLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

196

35%

LEVEL 2

231

42%

LEVEL 3

103

19%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

122

42%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

127

46%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

64

44%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

119

43%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

173

34%

LEVEL 2

216

42%

LEVEL 3

97

19%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

73

28%

LEVEL 2

112

43%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

144

29%

LEVEL 2

224

45%

LEVEL 3

102

21%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

118

46%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

52

87%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

28

88%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

96

27%

LEVEL 2

155

44%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

48

25%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

100

49%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

39

41%

LEVEL 2

41

44%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.