Skip to Content
Main content

MICHAEL J PETRIDES SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

84

15%

LEVEL 2

212

37%

LEVEL 3

168

30%

LEVEL 4

104

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

98

17%

LEVEL 2

197

35%

LEVEL 3

179

32%

LEVEL 4

92

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

65

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

53

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

56

21%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

69

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

106

35%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

60

56%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

35

33%

LEVEL 2

47

44%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

42

44%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

149

35%

LEVEL 4

98

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

143

35%

LEVEL 3

154

37%

LEVEL 4

85

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

58

41%

LEVEL 2

58

41%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

67

44%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

270
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

80

14%

LEVEL 2

211

38%

LEVEL 3

167

30%

LEVEL 4

103

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

270
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

94

17%

LEVEL 2

194

35%

LEVEL 3

178

32%

LEVEL 4

92

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

62

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

95

34%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.