Skip to Content
Main content

OUR WORLD NEIGHBORHOOD CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

133

29%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

67

16%

LEVEL 2

146

35%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

97

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

28

39%

LEVEL 4

20

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

28

36%

LEVEL 4

26

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

36

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

90
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

77

40%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

83

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

15

34%

LEVEL 2

25

57%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

18

49%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

215
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

83

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

207
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

143

35%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

96

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

35

35%

LEVEL 4

32

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.