Skip to Content
Main content

PS 171 PETER G VAN ALST GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

88

37%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

104

44%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

37

32%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

26

23%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

43

42%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

51

41%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

61

45%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

27

52%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

32

63%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

46

37%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

57

45%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

55

29%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

33

63%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

50

79%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

70

34%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

80

40%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

18

51%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

24

63%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

83

37%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

96

42%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.