Skip to Content
Main content

ALBERT SHANKER SCH-VISUAL/PERF ARTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

243

50%

LEVEL 2

170

35%

LEVEL 3

35

7%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

214

39%

LEVEL 2

189

35%

LEVEL 3

78

14%

LEVEL 4

63

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

116

48%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

127

52%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

120

42%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

30

31%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

22

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

74
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

42

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

22

45%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

65

68%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

54

67%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

128

51%

LEVEL 2

100

40%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

118

43%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

164

43%

LEVEL 2

151

39%

LEVEL 3

35

9%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

135

31%

LEVEL 2

170

39%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

79

79%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

79

77%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

70
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

176

45%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

33

8%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

139
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

157

34%

LEVEL 2

172

37%

LEVEL 3

78

17%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

67

74%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

57

75%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

12

48%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

235

51%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

33

7%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

201

40%

LEVEL 2

178

36%

LEVEL 3

67

13%

LEVEL 4

52

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.