Skip to Content
Main content

PS 101 SCHOOL IN THE GARDENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

139

49%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

139

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

73

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

71

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

66

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

68

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

78
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

57

66%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

86
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

64

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

62

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

52

39%

LEVEL 4

54

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

12

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

15

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

132

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

36

14%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

134

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

217
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

136

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

232
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

43

15%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

138

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

115

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

34

14%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

117

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

24

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

22

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.