JHS 189 DANIEL CARTER BEARD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

167

25%

LEVEL 2

249

38%

LEVEL 3

152

23%

LEVEL 4

90

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

133

22%

LEVEL 2

218

37%

LEVEL 3

131

22%

LEVEL 4

113

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

71

24%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

96

27%

LEVEL 2

132

37%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

204
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

65

15%

LEVEL 2

166

38%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

82

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

209
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

146

36%

LEVEL 3

107

26%

LEVEL 4

102

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

82

47%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

81

15%

LEVEL 2

218

41%

LEVEL 3

146

27%

LEVEL 4

87

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

176

37%

LEVEL 3

124

26%

LEVEL 4

111

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

86

68%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

66

56%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

181
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

171

39%

LEVEL 3

109

25%

LEVEL 4

72

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

157

38%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

90

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

77

36%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

62
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

63

34%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

50

21%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

55

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

136

38%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.