Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 87 MIDDLE VILLAGE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

124

34%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

72

24%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

65

35%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

59

33%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

81

45%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

59

42%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

79

45%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

52

21%

LEVEL 2

110

44%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

72

62%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

46

53%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

100

30%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

114

41%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

44

48%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

93

38%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

62

30%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.