Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 162 WILLOUGHBY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

193

43%

LEVEL 2

181

40%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

215

48%

LEVEL 2

190

42%

LEVEL 3

42

9%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

100

41%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

115

46%

LEVEL 2

112

45%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

93

45%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

100

49%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

175

44%

LEVEL 2

164

41%

LEVEL 3

50

13%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

196

48%

LEVEL 2

174

42%

LEVEL 3

37

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

125

35%

LEVEL 2

164

45%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

139

39%

LEVEL 2

167

47%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

68

79%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

76

76%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

68
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

137

37%

LEVEL 2

166

45%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

45
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

150

42%

LEVEL 2

166

46%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

56

73%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

65

71%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

45

45%

LEVEL 2

43

43%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

170

48%

LEVEL 2

147

42%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.