JHS 383 PHILIPPA SCHUYLER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 746

LEVEL 1

135

18%

LEVEL 2

378

51%

LEVEL 3

170

23%

LEVEL 4

63

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

176

23%

LEVEL 2

341

44%

LEVEL 3

190

24%

LEVEL 4

75

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

221

53%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

96

22%

LEVEL 2

198

45%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

157

48%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

80

24%

LEVEL 2

143

42%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

16

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

18

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

104
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

76

19%

LEVEL 2

213

54%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

105
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

161

45%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

140

49%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

127
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

81

22%

LEVEL 2

163

44%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

109

15%

LEVEL 2

368

52%

LEVEL 3

168

24%

LEVEL 4

63

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

133

18%

LEVEL 2

333

46%

LEVEL 3

187

26%

LEVEL 4

74

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

26

68%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

43

78%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

264
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 772

LEVEL 1

168

22%

LEVEL 2

340

44%

LEVEL 3

189

24%

LEVEL 4

75

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

79

53%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

78

43%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

115

19%

LEVEL 2

299

50%

LEVEL 3

133

22%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

142

24%

LEVEL 2

263

44%

LEVEL 3

137

23%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.