Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 14 SHELL BANK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

207

43%

LEVEL 2

191

39%

LEVEL 3

66

14%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

209

41%

LEVEL 2

204

40%

LEVEL 3

67

13%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

90

44%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

92

38%

LEVEL 2

96

40%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

117

41%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

117

43%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

37

38%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

50

43%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

130

49%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

131

48%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

35

43%

LEVEL 2

33

41%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

31

42%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

131

35%

LEVEL 2

158

42%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

117

29%

LEVEL 2

184

46%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

76

67%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

92

78%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

157

40%

LEVEL 2

157

40%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

166

38%

LEVEL 2

173

40%

LEVEL 3

62

14%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

50

54%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

43

52%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

19

44%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

23

38%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

192

43%

LEVEL 2

172

39%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

186

41%

LEVEL 2

181

40%

LEVEL 3

58

13%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.